Reporter: Have you read the climate report yet? Trump: I've seen it. I've read some of it and — it's fine. Reporter: They say the economic impact could be devastating. Trump: Yeah. I don't believe it. Reporter: You don't believe it? Trump: No, no. I don't believe it. And here's the other thing: You're going to have to have China and Japan and all of Asia and all of these other countries — you know, it addresses our country. Right now, we're at the cleanest we've ever been, and that's very important to me. But if we're clean but every other place on Earth is dirty, that's not so good.

What It Means

This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "Reporter: Have you read the climate report yet? Trump: I've seen it. I've read some of it and — it's fine. Reporter: They say the economic impact could be devastating. Trump: Yeah. I don't believe it. Reporter: You don't believe it? Trump: No, no. I don't believe it. And here's the other thing: You're going to have to have China and Japan and all of Asia and all of these other countries — you know, it addresses our country. Right now, we're at the cleanest we've ever been, and that's very important to me. But if we're clean but every other place on Earth is dirty, that's not so good." in the context of "November 26, 2018, on the Fourth National Climate Assessment (Bump, Philip (November 26, 2018), "Trump responds to his administration's report indicating a huge cost from climate change: ‘I don't believe it'", The Washington Post retrieved: December 1, 2018; (November 26, 2018), 'I don't believe it' - Trump on climate report, retrieved: December 1, 2018; "‘Yeah, I don't believe it': Trump on his administration's own climate report", The Guardian )." to mean that wisdom is timeless.