p. 280 as cited in: Enyinna, Okechukwu. "Is stakeholder theory really ethical?." African Journal of Business Ethics 7.2 (2013).
“

A preoccupation with instrumental consequences renders a theory that accommodates economic premises yet sidesteps the underlying tensions between the social and economic imperatives that confront organisations. Such a theory risks omitting the pressing descriptive and normative questions raised by these tensions, which, when explored, might hold great promise for a new theory and even for addressing practical management challenges.

— Joshua D. Margolis

What It Means

This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "A preoccupation with instrumental consequences renders a theory that accommodates economic premises yet sidesteps the underlying tensions between the social and economic imperatives that confront organisations. Such a theory risks omitting the pressing descriptive and normative questions raised by these tensions, which, when explored, might hold great promise for a new theory and even for addressing practical management challenges." in the context of "p. 280 as cited in: Enyinna, Okechukwu. "Is stakeholder theory really ethical?." African Journal of Business Ethics 7.2 (2013)." to mean that wisdom is timeless.

Quote Image
Source: Wikiquote: "Joshua D. Margolis" (Quotes, Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business, 2003: Margolis, Joshua D. and James P. Walsh. "Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business." Administrative science quarterly 48.2 (2003): 268-305.) The 'What it means' explanation text was generated by Google Gemini Flash (accessed January 19, 2026). https://gemini.google.com/app

About Joshua D. Margolis

Joshua D. Margolis is an American academic and the James Dinan and Elizabeth Miller Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School (HBS)