• Reprinted in A Century of Films: Derek Malcolm's Personal Best (I.B. Taurus, November 2000) Century of Cinema, pp. 20–22, 21–22
Jules et Jim seemed revolutionary at the time, but Truffaut's revolution, unlike Godard's, implied not so much the destruction of the past as a turning back to the humanism of Vigo, Renoir and the French cinema of the 30s. The film's "rondo of love" represents both a backward glance at the best of the past and a forward glance into the cinema's future. Its enthusiasm for what the cinema is and can be is what makes it so special.
What It Means
This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "Jules et Jim seemed revolutionary at the time, but Truffaut's revolution, unlike Godard's, implied not so much the destruction of the past as a turning back to the humanism of Vigo, Renoir and the French cinema of the 30s. The film's "rondo of love" represents both a backward glance at the best of the past and a forward glance into the cinema's future. Its enthusiasm for what the cinema is and can be is what makes it so special." in the context of ""François Truffaut: Jules et Jim", The Guardian (11 May 2000).
• Reprinted in A Century of Films: Derek Malcolm's Personal Best (I.B. Taurus, November 2000) Century of Cinema, pp. 20–22, 21–22" to mean that wisdom is timeless.
Tags
About Derek Malcolm