The gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint is that while alone with defendant at defendant’s home in January 2004, defendant deceived plaintiff into ingesting a narcotic or other type of drug which caused plaintiff to become semi-conscious, and thereafter defendant sexually assaulted plaintiff.

What It Means

This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "The gravamen of plaintiff’s complaint is that while alone with defendant at defendant’s home in January 2004, defendant deceived plaintiff into ingesting a narcotic or other type of drug which caused plaintiff to become semi-conscious, and thereafter defendant sexually assaulted plaintiff." in the context of "Judge Eduardo C. Robreno, (June 2, 2005) "2005 June 2 order by Court on motions by parties". Andrea Constand v. William H. Cosby, Jr. Case No. 2:05-cv-01099. Nature of Suit 320 Assault, Libel & Slander. Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander. Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court. Office: Philadelphia Office. Jury Demanded By: Defendant. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania." to mean that wisdom is timeless.