As far as Thapar and Rahman (1996) are concerned, there is nothing "to show that the Indo-Aryan peoples possessed a specific material culture, special pottery, or particular figurines that would enable us to establish some kind of identification marks for their migration" (1996, 277).

What It Means

This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "As far as Thapar and Rahman (1996) are concerned, there is nothing "to show that the Indo-Aryan peoples possessed a specific material culture, special pottery, or particular figurines that would enable us to establish some kind of identification marks for their migration" (1996, 277)." in the context of "in Bryant, E. F. (2001). The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture : the Indo-Aryan migration debate. Oxford University Press. chapter 10
• Thapar, B. K., and Abdul Rahman. 1996. "The Post-Indus Cultures." In History of Humanity (I-.266-219). Ed. A. H. Dani and J. P. Mohen. Paris: Routledge" to mean that wisdom is timeless.