There is not one instance, not one single, solitary instance in which Ambedkar participated in any activity connected with the struggle to free the country. Quite the contrary- at every possible turn he opposed the campaigns of the national movement, at every setback to the movement he was among those cheering for failure.

What It Means

This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "There is not one instance, not one single, solitary instance in which Ambedkar participated in any activity connected with the struggle to free the country. Quite the contrary- at every possible turn he opposed the campaigns of the national movement, at every setback to the movement he was among those cheering for failure." in the context of "Arun Shourie, Worshipping False Gods, 1997, ASA Publications, p. 1." to mean that wisdom is timeless.