The principal way that cognitive science can contribute to epistemology, I claim, is to identify basic belief-forming, or problem-solving processes. Once identified, these processes would be examined by primary epistemology according to the evaluative dimensions and standards adduced in Part I.

What It Means

This is a placeholder explanation generated by the low-overhead model. It interprets "The principal way that cognitive science can contribute to epistemology, I claim, is to identify basic belief-forming, or problem-solving processes. Once identified, these processes would be examined by primary epistemology according to the evaluative dimensions and standards adduced in Part I." in the context of "Alvin Goldman (1986), Epistemology and Cognition. p. 81" to mean that wisdom is timeless.